Effect Of Sex Role Orientation On Job Satisfaction Among Female Government Administrative Officers

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 30, 2017
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 1, Issue 1 January-June 2017

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rekha Singh

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to see the effect of sex role orientation on job satisfaction among female government administrative officers. A total of 100 female government administrative officers from the state of Rajasthan served as sample for the study. To attain the objectives of the study, two psychometric instruments—the Bern Sex role Inventory (Bern 1981) and the Job Satisfaction Index by Brayfield and Rothe (1951) —were administered to the sample population to obtain data pertaining to the sex role orientation and job satisfaction variables. The data were analysed in terms of the t-test. The results of the study revealed that female administrative officers with androgynous sex role orientation were higher on job satisfaction as compared to female administrative officers with masculinity sex role orientation.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Singh, R. . (2017). Effect Of Sex Role Orientation On Job Satisfaction Among Female Government Administrative Officers. NLDIMSR Innovision Journal of Management Research, 94–99. Retrieved from https://nldinnovision.com/index.php/nldimsr/article/view/41

References

  1. Andrisani, P.J. (1978). Job Satisfaction among Working Women. Signs, 3(3), 588-607. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Bern, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,42,155-162.
  3. Bern, S.L. (1981). Bern Sex-Role lnventory:Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  4. Bern & Sandra Lipsitz (1981) "Bern Sex-Role Inventory" Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print, 9
  5. Bernard, (1980). Bern Sex Role Inventory (BSRI).ln Sugihara, Y. & Katsurada, E. (in press) Gender role personality traits in Japanese culture, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28.
  6. Blanchard-Fields, F. & Friedt, L. (1988). Age as a moderator of the relation between three dimensions of satisfaction and sex role. Sex Roles, 18(11-12), 759-768.
  7. Blanchard-Fields &. Harris (1994). Bern Sex Role Inventory (BSRI).ln Sugihara, Y. & Katsurada, E. (in press) Gender role personality traits in Japanese culture. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28.
  8. Brayfield & Rothe (1951). An Index of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35,307-311.
  9. Chalermpiroj, J. & Nindang, K. et al. (2004). Antecedents of Employee Satisfaction: Homogeneous or Androgynous Managerial Characteristics. College of Management. Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  10. Dean, |. & Gilroy, F.D. (1993). Relation of sex-role orientation to life satisfaction in a healthy elderly sample. Journal of social Behavior and Personality, 8,133-140.
  11. Garcia, L.T. (1982}.Sex role orientation and stereotypes about male-female sexuality. Sex Roles, 8,863-876.
  12. Gujjar, R. & Mehta, M. (2011). Effect of Androgynous personality on Organizational role stress, marital adjustment, Job satisfaction and mental health amongst working women (university teachers, government doctors and administrative officers). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  13. Holt & Ellis (1998). Bern Sex Role Inventory (BSRI).ln Sugihara, Y. & Katsurada, E. (in press) Gender role personality traits in Japanese culture. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28.
  14. Jagacinski, C. M. (1982) Androgyny and Job Performance in a Male-Dominated Field. Organizational Stress. New York: John Wiley.
  15. Jagacinski, C. M. (1987). Androgyny in a male-dominated field: The relationship of sex-typed traits to performance and satisfaction in engineering. Sex Roles, 17 (9-10), 529-547
  16. Korabik, K. (1990). Androgyny and leadership styles. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4-5), 283-292.
  17. Krausz, M., Kedem, P., Tal, Z.&Amir, Y. (1992). Sex-role orientation and work adaptation of male nurses, Research Nurse Health, 15(5), 391-398.
  18. Major. Carnevale, P.J.D. 8t Deaux, K. (1981). A different perspective on androgyny: Evaluation of masculine and feminine personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 988-1001.
  19. McCall, M.E. & Struthers, N.J. (1994). Sex, sex-role orientation and self-esteem as predictors of coping style. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9,801-810.
  20. McCormic & Tiffin, J. (1974). Industrial Psychology. (6thEd.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
  21. Orlofsky, J. L. & O' Heron, C.A. (1987). Stereotypic and non-stereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations. Implications for personal adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1034-1042.
  22. Pedhazur & Tetenbaum, (1979). In Sugihara, Y. & Katsurada, E. (in press) Gender role personality traits in Japanese culture. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28.
  23. Rosenzweig, J.M., Dailey, D.M. (1989). Dyadic Adjustment, sexual satisfaction in women and men as a function of psychological sex role self-perception. Journal ofsex marital therapy, 15 (1), 42-56.
  24. Suhrer, R. & Hertzog (1994). Bern Sex Role Inventory (BSRI).ln Sugihara, Y. & Katsurada, E. (in press) Gender role personality traits in Japanese culture, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28.
  25. Williams, D.E. & D'Alessandro, J.D. (1994). A comparison of three measures of Androgyny and their relationship to psychological adjustment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9,469-480.
  26. Zammichieli, M.E., Gilroy, F.D., & Sherman, M.F. (1988). Relation between sex-role orientation and marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14,747-754.