Relation Between Computer Technology Usage and Academic Performance at Higher Education Institution

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Deepak Jaroliya
Sheetal Chhabra

Abstract

Computer technology expansion and upgradation is important in India today. Numerous opportunities are presented to educators. Technological advances play a very important role in everyone’s life and in every facet of life. Higher education is adopting these technologies to convert its major work. The computer may prove to be an asset for higher education institutions. Computer technology has transformed the higher education system. Computer technology has made teaching and learning easy and more enjoyable. Higher education facilitating its students to collect certificate / degree through online procedure. Online video and study material are improving students’ information literacy. Students are adopting video lectures and learning materials with the use of Internet. Technology literacy is making learning very efficient regardless of distance. Flexible and interactive teaching and learning amongst the students of different cultures enhancing their skills.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Jaroliya, D., & Chhabra, S. (2021). Relation Between Computer Technology Usage and Academic Performance at Higher Education Institution. NLDIMSR Innovision Journal of Management Research, 5(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://nldinnovision.com/index.php/nldimsr/article/view/28

References

  1. Anderson Jonathan and WeertTom van(2002). Information and communication technology in education. A curriculum for schools and programme of teacher development.
  2. Arts, J. W. C., Frambach, R. T., &Bymolt, T. H. A. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A metaanalysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134-144. https://do1. org/10.1016/j.14jresmar.2010.11.002.
  3. Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601-609. https://do1. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.05.002.
  4. Bower, M. (2011). Redesigning a web-conferencing environment to scaffold computing students’ creative design processes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 27-42.
  5. Bragdon, Rodney, A., & Dowler, Kristina (2016). College Student Technology Use and Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 6 (1), 1-11.
  6. Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50-57. doi.org/10.1016/).1heduc.2011.04.003.
  7. Dermentzi, E., Papagiannidis, S., Osorio Toro, C., & Yannopoulou, N. (2016). Academic engagement: Differences between intention to adopt social networking sites and other online technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 321-332. https://do1.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.019
  8. Hudson, T. M., Knight, V., & Collins, B. C. (2012). Perceived effectiveness of web conferencing software in the digital environment to deliver a graduate course in applied behavior analysis. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 27-39.
  9. Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703-714. doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507307.
  10. Lim, N., Gronlund, A., & Andersson, A. (2015). Cloud computing: The beliefs and perceptions of Swedish school principals. Computers and Education, 84, 90-100. doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.009.
  11. Lowerison Gretchen, SclaterJennifer, Schmid Richard F., Abrami Philip C. (2004). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.014
  12. Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 227-261.
  13. Masood A., Luqman A., Feng Y., Ali A. Adverse Consequences of excessive Social Networking Site Use on Academic Performance: Explaining Underlying Mechanism from Stress Perspective. Computers in Human Behavioour Vol 113 DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106476
  14. McCabe, D. B., & Meuter, M. L. (2011). A student view of technology in the classroom: Does it enhance the seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education? Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 149-159.
  15. Oliver, Ron (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228920282.
  16. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds (Publication Number 8010).
  17. Rodney A. Bragdon and Kristina Dowler (2016). College Student Technology Use and Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 6, No. 1; January 2016.
  18. Schindler Laura A., Burkholder Gary J.. Morad Osama A. and Marsh Craig (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. Schindler et al. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2017) 14:25 DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-00630
  19. Sharma D., Kumar S. (2021). Influence of Past Academic Performance and New Media Usage on Co-Scholastic Area Related Learning Outcomes For Senior Secondary School Students in North India. Journal of Content Community & Communication Vol 13 DOT: 10.31620/JCCC.06.21/27
  20. Syed Ali Raza, Komal Akaram Khan, S. M. Tariq Rafi (2020). Factors Affecting the Academic Performance through Cloud Computing Adoption. Journal of Education & Social Sciences Vol 8(2) 1-15 DOI: 10.20547/jess0822008201
  21. Tahani Z. Aldahdouh, Petri Nokelainen, and Vesa Korhonen (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage 1n Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open January-March 2020: 1— 20. DOT: 10.1177/2158244019899441.
  22. UGC Report 2018-19. Downloaded from https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/3060779_ UGC-Annual-Report-English-2018-19.pdf
  23. Wael Sh. Basri, Jehan A. Alandejani, and Feras M. Almadani (2018). ICT Adoption Impact on Students’ Academic Performance: Evidence from Saudi Universities. Hindawi Education Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 1240197, 9 pages https://do1.org/10.1155/2018/1240197.